4ORM FINANCE
PRE-SEED DATA ROOM · CONFIDENTIAL
04.3

Phase-One
Hiring Plan

A working draft of the first-phase team: the seats to fill, the order to fill them, indicative loaded compensation, and how the plan sits inside the $3M pre-seed. Every figure is a planning range, deliberately left with room to move.

PREPARED BY
KCS Capital · Founder draft
ROUND STATUS
Pre-Seed $3M
Opens July 1, 2026
CATEGORY
04 · Organization
Document 04.3
STATUS
Draft · Planning
June 2026
1.0
THE TEAM TO BUILD

A small, senior, build-phase team

Phase one is the 2026 development year: the goal is to ship the regulated tokenization rails, not to scale go-to-market. That argues for a small, senior team weighted toward engineering and compliance, with the rest of the company deliberately deferred to Series A. The roster below is the full phase-one team as currently planned — eight seats, one already filled.

Draft · for planning

This is a founder working draft, not a commitment. Seats, titles, and the figures throughout are indicative and sized to leave room to move as the right people are found and as the raise closes. Treat every number as a planning band, not a budget line.

SEATMANDATESTATUSNOTE
Chief Technology OfficerArchitecture, eng leadership, hires and owns the build teamOPEN · W1First or co-first seat; equity-weighted
Chief Compliance OfficerRegulatory strategy, custody & reserve compliance, regulator relationshipsOPEN · W1Full-time or fractional-to-start (see 3.0)
Security Lead / Sr. Security EngineerCustody security, key management, threat model, auditsOPEN · W2Existential for a custody platform
Back-End DeveloperCore ledger, settlement, APIs, integrationsOPEN · W2Hired by the CTO
Front-End DeveloperInstitutional UI, dashboards, onboarding flowsOPEN · W2Hired by the CTO
AI LeadAI tooling and automation across the platformIN SEATAlready on the team
Fractional CFOFinancial control, model stewardship, raise supportOPEN · W3Fractional by design, not full-time
Product / Operations GeneralistProduct coordination and operating leverage for the seniorsOPEN · W3The one flex seat; could be founder-covered

The shape matters more than the count. Four of the eight seats are engineering (CTO, security, back-end, front-end, plus the AI lead already in seat), two are the financial-and-regulatory spine (CCO, fractional CFO), and one is a single operating generalist. There is intentionally no sales, marketing, or business-development headcount in phase one — the product is not yet shippable, and those functions belong to the Series A team.

Why compliance sits at the top, not the side

In regulated tokenized rails, compliance requirements are engineering requirements. Custody tiers under CIRO's framework, privacy-by-design, and stablecoin reserve and segregation rules all shape the architecture from day one. That is why the CCO is a phase-one seat hired alongside the CTO, not an overhead role added later (see documents 02.3 and 02.4 for the regulatory backdrop).

2.0
THE ORDER TO HIRE

Sequence is the discipline

The order of these hires matters as much as the list. The leadership and regulatory spine come first because they shape what gets built and define who else to bring in; the build pod follows under the CTO; the flex seats come last. Three waves, spread across the build year.

Wave 1 · Lead & regulate first
Chief Technology Officer + Chief Compliance Officer. The first two seats, hired close together. The CTO owns the architecture and should personally vet and hire the build pod — founders should not be hiring senior engineers ahead of the technical leader. The CCO sets the regulatory requirements that the architecture has to satisfy, so the two seats are designed in tandem. Targeting these as the earliest post-close hires.
Wave 2 · Build the pod
Security Lead, then Back-End and Front-End Developers. Brought in by the CTO once architecture direction is set. Security leads the pod because custody is the part of the system where a single failure is existential; the back-end and front-end developers follow to build the ledger, settlement, APIs, and the institutional interface. The AI lead, already in seat, works across all three.
Wave 3 · Add leverage, keep it lean
Fractional CFO and a Product / Operations Generalist. The fractional CFO comes in as financial control and raise-support needs grow — fractional by design, converting toward full-time only at Series A. The single operating generalist gives the senior engineers leverage and can be deferred or founder-covered if the build is on track. Design and QA stay on contract through phase one rather than becoming headcount.
What we are deliberately not hiring yet

No full-time sales, marketing, BD, design, or QA in phase one. Those are real functions — they are simply Series A functions. Holding the line here is what keeps the build-year team small enough to fund from the pre-seed without compressing runway.

3.0
COST & BURN

Indicative loaded comp, and how it sits in the $3M

The figures below are planning bands, not offers. Each is a fully loaded annual cost — base plus roughly 20–25% for employer costs, benefits, and equipment — in Canadian dollars, and most packages are expected to be equity-weighted, which trades cash today for ownership. The point of the band is to keep room: hire toward the low end where equity does the work, the high end where the right person commands it.

SEATLOADED ANNUAL (INDICATIVE)BASIS
Chief Technology Officer$200K – $260KEquity-weighted
Chief Compliance Officer$170K – $220KFT; fractional ~$90–120K
Security Lead$160K – $200KFull-time
Back-End Developer$130K – $170KFull-time
Front-End Developer$120K – $160KFull-time
Fractional CFO$60K – $110KFractional
Product / Ops Generalist$110K – $150KFlex / deferrable
New-seat run-rate (annualized)~$0.9M – $1.3M7 open seats
AI Lead (already in seat)$150K – $190KIn place
Full-team run-rate (annualized)~$1.05M – $1.45M8 seats

Two things keep this comfortably inside the $3M. First, the hires are staggered across the year, so the year-one cash outlay on people is well below the annualized run-rate — on a Wave 1–3 schedule, roughly $0.6M–$0.9M of actual phase-one salary cost rather than the full run-rate. Second, several packages are equity-weighted and two roles (CFO, generalist) are fractional or deferrable, which flexes cash down further if needed.

PHASE-ONE USE OF THE $3M (PLANNING)INDICATIVE
Team / salaries (staggered, year one)$0.6M – $0.9M
Non-comp OpEx — legal, audit, infra, filings$0.4M – $0.7M
Reserve / contingencyheld back
Against the raise$3.0M
Where the Education bridge fits

The 4orm Education revenue bridge (document 05.2) is what lets this team be carried through the build year without compressing runway or over-diluting: it earns from the same institutions during development, offsetting OpEx and extending the runway toward Series A. The hiring plan is sized to be fundable from the $3M on its own; the Education bridge is the cushion that turns a ~15–18 month runway into a more comfortable one.

References
  1. Compensation bands are indicative Canadian-market planning ranges for the build phase, fully loaded; to be confirmed against the compensation market study and live candidate offers.
  2. Funding envelope and use-of-proceeds context: 4orm Five-Year Financial Model v8 (document 05.1) and Capital Structure Memorandum (document 08.1).
  3. Education revenue bridge: 4orm Education GTM Revenue Bridge (document 05.2). Regulatory backdrop shaping the CCO mandate: documents 02.3 and 02.4.

Draft for planning. Seats, sequence, and all figures are indicative and subject to change as hiring proceeds and the raise closes. Not an offer of employment and not an offering document.

DATA.4ORMFINANCE.COM
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION